Take 10% OFF—Expires in h m s Use code save10u during checkout.

Claim Offer

International support numbers

USA
+1 (800) 405-2972Toll-free +1 (702) 979-7365Local/SMS
CAN
+1 (800) 597-3941Toll-free
AUS
+1 (800) 764-195Toll-free
GBR
+0 (808) 134-9867Toll-free

Election Years 1916 Versus 2016: A Sample Comparative Essay

    Select network

    The 2016 presidential race is perhaps the most hotly contested, polarizing election in United States history. While originally each party had a multitude of potential candidates vying for the nomination, the party candidates have finally been decided. Hillary Clinton will run for the Democrats and Donald Trump will run for the Republicans in the general election. No matter which candidate you endorse, each has garnered a negative image. Many see this election as settling for the Best of the Worst.

    While the reputation of the candidates is perhaps at an all-time low, the platforms that each party are attached to are not all that different from those of 100 years ago. Like 1916, the current election year finds the country immersed in a tumultuous global environment, but can this country’s newest President lead us through these times like that of 1916? This sample comparative essay will analyze the candidates and policies of the 1916 election and the 2016 election.

    Ultius offers a variety of writing services including comparative essays like this one. We know that writing and structuring readable essays isn't easy and making a logical comparison between two such drastically different election years would leave many writers at a loss for direction. The benefits of buying a comparative essay for your own reference are numerous and if after reading the following essay you still have concerns, visit our website for more help.

    Election year 1916 versus 2016: The candidates of 1916

    1916 was a tumultuous time in American history. While the current election year is filled with a myriad of issues, the campaign of 1916 was concerned with one thing: war. World War I had been raging in Europe since 1914, and at an enormous toll on men and materials. Although the United States was outraged at the sinking of the British liner Lusitania by a German U-boat resulting in the loss of many Americans aboard, the country wanted no part in the war and at the time of the election had not yet entered the battle (“United States Elections”).

    Unlike this election year, the candidates of 1916 had little opposition from within their party. President Woodrow Wilson and Vice President Thomas Marshall were re-nominated at the 1916 Democratic convention without opposition. Wilson had garnered high public approval after persuading Germany to change its unrestricted submarine warfare policy, and also for having successfully kept America out of the war until that point. In fact, his slogan was “He kept us out of war,” but Wilson had doubts about his ability to continue to keep America at peace (Election of 1916”).

    The Republican Party was slightly less straightforward in nominating a candidate. Many pushed Theodore Roosevelt as he supported external intervention to achieve peace, to run again, but he failed to win the nomination. The Party had been split in the previous election of 1912, and sought to repair that division by nominating Supreme Court Associate Justice Charles Evans Hughes along with former Vice President Charles Fairbanks, who had served under Roosevelt. Although Hughes largely shared Wilson’s views about keeping America out of the war, he became labeled as a war candidate due to many seemingly pro-war speeches by Roosevelt. The country was very anti-war during 1916, and this image of Hughes as a possible pro-war candidate may have lost him the election (Election of 1916”).

    Election year 1916 versus 2016: The Democratic Party Platform of 1916

    As with the current 2016 U.S. election, the election of 1916 was coming off of four years of Democratic reign in the White House. As a result, the platform adopted at the Democratic National Convention sought to highlight the achievements of the past four years. They also planned to lay a path for goals that were hoped to be accomplished by the Party in the coming years. The demographics of the Democratic Party reflected an affinity for highlighting the achievements of the past four years of the presidency of Woodrow Wilson. In particular, the party challenged others to compare their record and keeping of pledges with other parties and administrations throughout history (“Democratic Party Platform”). Other notable items of importance to the Democratic Party in 1916 are listed below: 

    1. Record of Achievement
    2. Economic Freedom
    3. Tariff
    4. Americanism
    5. Preparedness
    6. International Relation
    7. Pan-American Concord
    8. Mexico
    9. Merchant Marine
    10. Conservation
    11. The Administration of the Farmer
    12. Good Roads
    13. Government Employment
    14. Labor
    15. Public Health
    16. Senate Rules
    17. Economy and the Budget
    18. Civil Service
    19. Philippine Islands
    20. Woman's Suffrage
    21. Protection of Citizens
    22. Prison Reform
    23. Pensions
    24. Waterways and Flood Control
    25. Alaska
    26. Territories
    27. Candidates

    Election year 1916 Versus 2016: Republican Party Platform of 1916

    On the other hand, the Republican Party of 1916 sought to reunify and portray itself as standing for the United States people and American ideals. Additionally, the Party swore allegiance to none other than the Constitution, government, and American traditions much like the Tea Party of today. Interestingly, this regression to the mean of so-called “core American ideals” has a great deal of overlap with the goals and priorities of the Democratic Party of the time (“Republican Party Platform”). The major issues of the Republican Party are as follows:

    1. Protection of American Rights
    2. Foreign Relations
    3. Mexico
    4. Monroe Doctrine
    5. Latin America 
    6. Philippines
    7. Right of Expatriation
    8. Protection of the Country
    9. Tariff
    10. Business
    11. Rural Credits
    12. Rural Free Delivery
    13. Merchant Marine
    14. Transportation 
    15. Economy and the National Budget
    16. Conservation
    17. Civil Service Reform
    18. Territorial Officials
    19. Labor Laws
    20. Suffrage

    Election vear 1916 versus 2016: The candidates of 2016

    As this year’s tumultuous primaries came to a close with Hillary Clinton for the Democrats and Donald Trump for the Republicans. Clinton had a fight on her hands with fellow nominee Bernie Sanders, but secured the nomination by winning the necessary delegates. Although shrouded in controversy with the ongoing Benghazi investigation, in another recently published sample MLA essay, the writer points out that Clinton does bring a wealth of experience in politics. She is the former Secretary of State, as well as a former United States Senator. Additionally, Clinton spent eight years as First Lady for President Clinton in the 1990’s (“Compare”).

    On the other hand, Republican nominee Donald Trump has comparatively little political experience, yet has dabbled in many business ventures. He is also the most controversial candidate of these elections, who has a penchant for speaking his mind and disregarding any offense he might commit in the process. Although he has never held an elected office, he is the current President of Trump Operations, the Chairman of Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts, and the Founder/Chairman, President/Chief Executive Officer of The Trump Organization since 1975 (“Compare”). 

    Election year 1916 Versus 2016: Party Platforms of 2016

    Neither the Democrats or Republicans have released official Party platforms for this year’s election to date, but each respective candidate has largely taken a stance on many major issues. Those issues include individual rights, domestic issues, economic issues, and defense and international issues ("Compare"). 

    2016 Democratic Platform

    Individual Rights

    • Abortion is a woman’s unrestricted right – Strongly Agrees
    • Legally require hiring women and minorities – Strongly Agrees
    • Comfortable with same-sex marriage – Strongly Agrees
    • Keep God in the public sphere – Agrees
    • EPA regulations are too restrictive – Strongly Disagrees
    • Make voter registration easier – Strongly Agrees

    Domestic Issues

    • Stricter punishment reduces crime – Disagrees
    • Absolute right to gun ownership – Strongly Disagrees
    • Expand ObamaCare – Strongly Agrees
    • Vouchers for school choice – Strongly Disagrees
    • Prioritize green energy – Strongly Agrees
    • Marijuana is a gateway drug – Disagrees

    Economic Issues

    • Stimulus better than market-led recovery – Strongly Agrees
    • Higher taxes on the wealthy – Strongly Agrees
    • Pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens – Strongly Agrees
    • Privatize Social Security – Strongly Disagrees

    Defense and International Issues

    • Support and expand free trade – Disagrees
    • Expand the military – Disagrees
    • Support American Exceptionalism – Disagrees
    • Avoid foreign entanglements - Disagrees

    2016: Republican Party Platform

    Individual Rights

    • Abortion is a woman’s unrestricted right – Disagrees
    • Legally require hiring women and minorities – Neutral
    • Comfortable with same-sex marriage – Disagrees
    • Keep God in the public sphere – Strongly Agrees
    • EPA regulations are too restrictive – Strongly Agrees
    • Make voter registration easier – Agrees

    Domestic Issues

    • Stricter punishment reduces crime – Strongly Agrees
    • Absolute right to gun ownership – Strongly Agrees
    • Expand ObamaCare – Disagrees
    • Vouchers for school choice – Strongly Agrees
    • Prioritize green energy – Strongly Disagrees
    • Marijuana is a gateway drug - Disagrees

    Economic Issues

    • Stimulus better than market-led recovery – Strongly Disagrees
    • Higher taxes on the wealthy – Agrees
    • Pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens – Strongly Disagrees
    • Privatize Social Security – Agrees

    Defense and International Issues

    • Support and expand free trade – Strongly Disagrees
    • Expand the military – Agrees
    • Support American Exceptionalism – Agrees
    • Avoid foreign entanglements - Agrees

    It remains to be seen which controversial candidate will become our next president. However, we can be assured that this election will be one of the most historic. For more information on previous Party platforms and current Party trends, visit www.Democrats.org or www.GOP.com No matter what your stance, make your voice heard and vote.

    Works Cited

    “Compare.” InsideGov. InsideGov, 2016. Web. 7 June 2016. http://presidential-candidates.insidegov.com/compare/40-70/Hillary-Clinton-vs-Donald-Trump

    “Democratic Party Platform of 1916.” Political Party Platforms. The American Presidency Project, 2016. Web. 7 June 2016. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=29591

    “Election of 1916: Now Just Two Parties, but Same Results as 1912.” United States History. United States History, 2016. Web. 7 June 2016. https://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h888.html

    “Our Platform.” Democrats. Democrats, 2016. Web. 7 June 2016. https://www.democrats.org/party-platform

    “Republican Party Platform of 1916.” Political Party Platforms. The American Presidency Project, 2016. Web. 7 June 2016. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=29634

    “Republican Platform: We Believe in America.” GOP. GOP, 2016. Web. 7 June 2016. https://www.gop.com/platform/

    “United States Elections: Presidential Elections (1916).” Historical Boys’ Clothing. Historical Boys’ Clothing, 19 April 2012. Web. 7 June 2016. https://www.histclo.com/country/us/hist/elect/20/e1916p.html

     
    •  
     

    http://www.ultius.com/ultius-blog/entry/election-years-1916-versus-2016-a-sample-comparative-essay.html

    Ultius, Inc. "Election Years 1916 Versus 2016: A Sample Comparative Essay." Ultius | Custom Writing and Editing Services. Ultius Blog, 02 Aug. 2016. http://www.ultius.com/ultius-blog/entry/election-years-1916-versus-2016-a-sample-comparative-essay.html

    Copied to clipboard

    Ultius, Inc. (2016, August 02). Election Years 1916 Versus 2016: A Sample Comparative Essay. Retrieved from Ultius | Custom Writing and Editing Services, http://www.ultius.com/ultius-blog/entry/election-years-1916-versus-2016-a-sample-comparative-essay.html

    Copied to clipboard

    Ultius, Inc. "Election Years 1916 Versus 2016: A Sample Comparative Essay." Ultius | Custom Writing and Editing Services. August 02, 2016. http://www.ultius.com/ultius-blog/entry/election-years-1916-versus-2016-a-sample-comparative-essay.html.

    Copied to clipboard

    Ultius, Inc. "Election Years 1916 Versus 2016: A Sample Comparative Essay." Ultius | Custom Writing and Editing Services. August 02, 2016. http://www.ultius.com/ultius-blog/entry/election-years-1916-versus-2016-a-sample-comparative-essay.html.

    Copied to clipboard

    Rate this blog entry:
    0
     

    Author

    Ultius - Blogger avatar

    Ultius is the trusted provider of content solutions and matches customers with highly qualified writers for sample writing, academic editing, and business writing. 

    About The Author

    This post was written by Ultius.

    Ultius - Writing & Editing Help

    Contact

    Connect

    Ultius is the trusted provider of content solutions for consumers around the world. Connect with great American writers and get 24/7 support.

    Download Ultius for Android on the Google Play Store DMCA.com Protection Status

    © 2019 Ultius, Inc.